RV Travel eMagazine re-posted this

Read that note at the beginning of the story, they express some doubt about how that list was created.

Yeah, very scientific - taken from Facebook.  I mean, it’s gotta be accurate, right? It’s Facebook!

I saw it on the internet so it must be true. 

These are the kinds of crap lists that are generated constantly to get hits and likes and shares on Facebook and other social media.  Their content is highly questionable and the title often starts with something sensationalistic like "STAY AWAY FROM THESE...".  or "YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHO...".

And then other sites pick them up simply because it is fodder to be fed into their mill.  Round and round she goes...

I suspect that this is just one more example of an RV owner with a website trying to drive visitors to his site by claiming some expertise that he really doesn't have. There are at least 2 RVs on that list which show up with high recommendations on these and other forums that I participate in. His choice of source is probably a good indication of the quality and reliability of his entire site. He seems to consider the amount of content more important then the accuracy of his content. 

  On 12/9/2019 at 3:58 AM, Kirk W said:

He seems to consider the amount of content more important then the accuracy of his content.

I believe it's a trend.  Just  watch the evening news and weather,  Sensationalism is much more important than accuracy.  I try to avoid news or weather that has advertising, as their primary purpose is to generate $$.

LOL, why have a list? All of us already know the worst brand list. All of them...

  On 12/9/2019 at 3:58 AM, Kirk W said:

I suspect that this is just one more example of an RV owner with a website trying to drive visitors to his site by claiming some expertise that he really doesn't have. There are at least 2 RVs on that list which show up with high recommendations on these and other forums that I participate in. His choice of source is probably a good indication of the quality and reliability of his entire site. He seems to consider the amount of content more important then the accuracy of his content. 

Apparently - Thread starter (The OP) "Agesilaus" is on a Crusade of his own !!!...?

He has posted the same info on RV Net !!!

Hmmmmm.....Wonder if HE is the OWNER of the website doing the "driving" ?? 

~

Having dealt with Keystone warranty issues from December 2018 through August 2019, I would put them at the top of the list.  But number two is probably also very accurate.  F that company.

Yea, how come mines not on that list.

There should be a very short list of those that should not be on the list. Maybe 2 or 3.

Edited December 11 by markandkim

  On 12/11/2019 at 2:01 AM, Carlos said:

Having dealt with Keystone warranty issues from December 2018 through August 2019, I would put them at the top of the list.  But number two is probably also very accurate.  F that company.

 

 So I'll add .02 to disagree  with your "F" ratings (due to your stupid A reply!)

I have a #3.  No problems in the 10 years I've had it.  Stuff must change after #2, ROTFL !

Agree with "attention getter" posters - not any better that commercials on TV.  Some you *might* pay attention to, others = change the channel.

Now....... - where's the Bogus Button on the keyboard for: The List (& thread starter), and Carlos.

☹️

Every manufacturer can accidentally make a unit with no defects once in a while.  I've talked to one person with no issues on a Keystone (and only one).

  On 12/15/2019 at 2:59 AM, Carlos said:

Every manufacturer can accidentally make a unit with no defects once in a while.  I've talked to one person with no issues on a Keystone (and only one).

As opposed to the hundreds with the opposite opinion, huh?

With those resources - YOU - need to author a "LIST", ROTFLMAO

~

 
Just now, Carlos said:

 

I've never heard a positive opinion on Keystone.  I guess you're the first.  With those resources, YOU should make a list too.

And why so salty and aggressive, it's just a trailer.

My Teton has been mostly trouble free. Now it is a 2003 and some items needed replacing but nothing really out of order. But again, lots of better made campers came from that time. I went looking for new one before buying our Teton. I was not impressed with anything on the market. But the worst is hard to say. Open Range looked to be about the cheapest made unit we found. And with a chassis so light, I couldn't rate it very high at all. Heartland seemed decent. Not high dollar decor but all right. But they have has some issuses also. Montana looked okay. America loves it, it seems. We wanted a nicer unt. We looked at a lot of units but really all out of Indinana looked about the same.